Justiça Constitucional - 2020.2

  

UNIDADE 1 - IGUALDADE E DIREITOS SOCIAIS NA(EM) CRISE

1.     Direitos sociais

1.PAVLIDOU, Kyriaki. Social Rights in the Greek Austerity Crisis: Reframing Constitutional Pluralism. Italian J. Pub. L., v. 10, p. 287, 2018.

2.KOVTUN, V. I.; KOVTUN, M. S. Social rights after the global financial crisis: European dimension. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice, v. 1, n. 24, p. 426-433, 2018.(***)

3.CHRISTODOULIDIS, Emilios. Social rights constitutionalism: An antagonistic endorsement. Journal of Law and Society, v. 44, n. 1, p. 123-149, 2017. (***)

4.LÓPEZ, Marc Carrillo. The impact of the crisis on social rights. Catalan Social Sciences Review, p. 25-52, 2016.

5.MATTEUCCI, Stefano Civitarese; HALLIDAY, Simon. Constitutional Law and Social Welfare After the Economic Crisis. In: European Democratic Institutions and Administrations. Springer, Cham, 2018. p. 149-168 (***)

2.     Uma questão de raça

6.KYMLICKA, Bhikhu Parekh et al. Diversity, Democracy, Justice. Ethnicity, Identity and Public Policy, p. 271 (excelente livro). (***)

7.MOHAI, Paul; PELLOW, David; ROBERTS, J. Timmons. Environmental justice. Annual review of environment and resources, v. 34, p. 405-430, 2009.

8.SAULL, Richard. Racism and far right imaginaries within neo-liberal political economy. New Political Economy, v. 23, n. 5, p. 588-608, 2018. (***)

9.VIRDEE, Satnam; MCGEEVER, Brendan. Racism, crisis, brexit. Ethnic and racial studies, v. 41, n. 10, p. 1802-1819, 2018.

UNIDADE 2  - DEMOCRACIA EM TRANSE

1.     Velhos desafios

10.LOUGHLIN, Martin. The contemporary crisis of constitutional democracy. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, v. 39, n. 2, p. 435-454, 2019

11.SCICLUNA, Nicole. Politicization without democratization: How the Eurozone crisis is transforming EU law and politics. International Journal of Constitutional Law, v. 12, n. 3, p. 545-571, 2014.

12.MENÉNDEZ, Agustín J. The crisis of law and the European crises: From the social and democratic Rechtsstaat to the consolidating state of (pseudo‐) technocratic governance. Journal of Law and Society, v. 44, n. 1, p. 56-78, 2017(***)

13.KOBYLIŃSKI, Andrzej et al. From Paul Vladimiri to Gustavo Zagrebelsky. Constitutional justice in the age of hybrid warfare. Studia Philosophiae Christianae, v. 53, n. 3, p. 97-113, 2017.

2.     Algoritmos e plataformas 

14.MARCHETTI, Gloria. The Role of Algorithms in the Crisis of Democracy. 2020. (breve)

15.HOWARD, Philip N.; WOOLLEY, Samuel; CALO, Ryan. Algorithms, bots, and political communication in the US 2016 election: The challenge of automated political communication for election law and administration. Journal of information technology & politics, v.. (***)

16.GURUMURTHY, Anita; BHARTHUR, Deepti. Democracy and the algorithmic turn. SUR-Int'l J. on Hum Rts., v. 27, p. 39, 2018(***)

17.STARK, Birgit; STEGMANN, Daniel. Are Algorithms a Threat to Democracy? The Rise of Intermediaries: A Challenge for Public Discourse. 2020.

3.     Neo e paleopopulismo.

18.STAVRAKAKIS, Yannis et al. Populism, anti-populism and crisis. Contemporary Political Theory, v. 17, n. 1, p. 4-27, 2018. (***)

19.UNGUREANU, Camil; SERRANO, Ivan. El populismo como relato y la crisis de la democracia representativa/Populism as a narrative and the crisis of representative democracy. Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, n. 119, p. 13-34, 2018.

20.COX, Michael. The rise of populism and the crisis of globalisation: Brexit, Trump and beyond. Irish Studies in International Affairs, v. 28, p. 9-17, 2017. (***)

UNIDADE 3 - JUIZ PRECONCEITUOSO - CONTRIBUIÇÃO DA NEUROCIÊNCIA

21.HORTA, Ricardo Lins. Why Are There Cognitives Biases in the Judicial Decision Taking: The Contribution of Psychology and Neurosciences to the Juridical Debate. Braz. J. Pub. Pol'y, v. 9, p. 84, 2019. (***)

22.BRADLEY, Anna Spain. The Disruptive Neuroscience of Judicial Choice. UC Irvine L. Rev., v. 9, p. 1, 2018. (***)

23.DE LINS, Ricardo et al. Por que existem vieses cognitivos na Tomada de Decisão Judicial? A contribuição da Psicologia e das Neurociências para o debate jurídico. Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas, v. 9, n. 3, p. 84-122, 2020. (***)

UNIDADE 4 - COVID19

24.MAOR, Moshe; SULITZEANU-KENAN, Raanan; CHINITZ, David. When COVID-19, constitutional crisis, and political deadlock meet: the Israeli case from a disproportionate policy perspective. Policy and Society, p. 1-16, 2020. (Explicar rapidamente constitutionalismo e controle de constitucionalidade em Israel)

25.Bloco (***)

TEPE, Markus et al. Pandemic Balancing Acts: Early COVID-19 lockdown changes how Germans trade off lives and weigh constitutional powers. 2020. (Breve)

AMAT, Francesc et al. Pandemics meet democracy. Experimental evidence from the COVID-19 crisis in Spain. 2020.

BAYERLEIN, Michael; GYÖNGYÖSI, Győző. The Impact of Covid-19 on Populism: Will It be Weakened?. Kieler beiträge zur wirtschaftspolitik, 2020.

Extra

RAPÔSO, Cláudio Filipe Lima et al. LGPD-Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais em Tecnologia da Informação: Revisão Sistemática. RACE-Revista de Administração do Cesmac, v. 4, p. 58-67, 2019.

BIONI, Bruno Ricardo; LUCIANO, Maria. O Princípio da Precaução na Regulação de Inteligência Artificial: seriam as leis de proteção de dados o seu portal de entrada. Inteligência artificial e direito: ética, regulação e responsabilidade. São Paulo: Thomson Reuters Brasil, 2019.