segunda-feira, 21 de agosto de 2023

Teorias contemporâneas da constituição


I - Constitucionalismo e plutocracia

1. HARRIS, Daniel. Critically Analyzing American Constitutionalism. 2022.

2. KHAITAN, Tarunabh. Political insurance for the (relative) poor: How liberal constitutionalism could resist plutocracy. Global Constitutionalism, v. 8, n. 3, p. 536-570, 2019.

3. WICK, Mia. Human Rights, the Pandemic, and the Turning Tide of the Populist Wave: Can COVID-19 Be a Catalyst for Change?. Interdisc. J. Populism, v. 3, p. 35, 2022.

II - Constitucionalismo ordoliberal e crise

4. SAMPAIO, José Adércio Leite. A Constituição Austeritária. Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL], v. 21, n. 1, p. 39-58, 2020.

5. SCHNEIDER, Etienne. Germany’s Industrial strategy 2030, EU competition policy and the Crisis of New Constitutionalism.(Geo-) political economy of a contested paradigm shift. New political economy, v. 28, n. 2, p. 241-258, 2023.

6. ABELS, Joscha. Does the current crisis mark the end of the EU’s austerity era? Competing political projects in European fiscal governance. Comparative European Politics, p. 1-20, 2023.

III - Constitucionalismo populista

7. MOHANTY, Aparajita; PRASHANT, Priyanka. Populist constitutionalism or constitutional populism: The perpetual dilemma. Journal of Positive School Psychology, v. 6, n. 3, p. 3430–3442-3430–3442, 2022.

8. TUSHNET, Mark; BUGARIC, Bojan. Populism and constitutionalism: An essay on definitions and their implications. Cardozo L. Rev., v. 42, p. 2345, 2020.

9. HALMAI, Gábor. Populism, authoritarianism and constitutionalism. German law journal, v. 20, n. 3, p. 296-313, 2019.

10. OKLOPCIC, Zoran. Imagined ideologies: Populist figures, liberalist projections, and the horizons of constitutionalism. German Law Journal, v. 20, n. 2, p. 201-224, 2019.

11. BLOKKER, Paul. Populism as a constitutional project. International Journal of Constitutional Law, v. 17, n. 2, p. 536-553, 2019.

12. MEDUSHEVSKIY, Andrei N. et al. Global Constitutionalism and Legal Fragmentation: The Populist Backslide in Central and Eastern Europe. Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, v. 30, n. 4, p. 393-440, 2021.

13. SCHEPPELE, Kim Lane. The opportunism of populists and the defense of constitutional liberalism. German Law Journal, v. 20, n. 3, p. 314-331, 2019.

14. TATHAM, Allan Francis. The paradox of judicial dialogue with the European Court of Justice in an illiberal democracy: The recent experience with the Hungarian Constitutional Court. Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo, n. 72, p. 483-517, 2022.

IV - Constitucionalismo iliberal, constitucionalismo abusivo e constitucionalismo autoritário

15 SAJÓ, András. Ruling by cheating: governance in illiberal democracy. Cambridge University Press, 2021.

15. SAJÓ, András et al. The constitution of illiberal democracy as a theory about society. Polish Sociological Review, v. 208, n. 4, p. 396-412, 2019.

16. HALMAI, Gábor. Illiberal constitutional theories. Jus politicum, p. 135-152, 2021.

17. EISLER, Jacob et al. The pendulum swings back: New authoritarian threats to liberal democratic constitutionalism. Global Constitutionalism, v. 11, n. 1, p. 1-8, 2022.

18. LEVINSON, Sanford. Assessing" Abusive Constitutionalism" in a Complex Political Universe. Can. J. Comp. & Contemp. L., v. 7, p. 15, 2021.

19. DRINÓCZI, Tímea; BIEŃ-KACAŁA, Agnieszka. Illiberal constitutionalism: The case of Hungary and Poland. German Law Journal, v. 20, n. 8, p. 1140-1166, 2019.

20. LI-ANN, Thio. Varieties of constitutionalism in Asia. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, v. 16, n. 2, p. 285-310, 2021.

21. GUO, Baogang. A partocracy with Chinese characteristics: Governance system reform under Xi Jinping. Journal of Contemporary China, v. 29, n. 126, p. 809-823, 2020.

22. THORNTON, Patricia M. Of constitutions, campaigns and commissions: a century of democratic centralism under the CCP. The China Quarterly, v. 248, n. S1, p. 52-72, 2021.

23. CHANG, Yung-Yung. The post-pandemic world: Between constitutionalized and authoritarian orders–China’s narrative-power play in the pandemic era. Journal of Chinese political science, v. 26, n. 1, p. 27-65, 2021.

24. KOCHI, Tarik. The end of global constitutionalism and rise of antidemocratic politics. Global Society, v. 34, n. 4, p. 487-506, 2020.

25. LANDAU, David. The Myth of the Illiberal Democratic Constitution. FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper, n. 21-08, 2021.

V - Novos constitucionalismos

26. BISCAHIE, Thibault; GILL, Stephen. Three Dialectics of Global Governance and the Future of New Constitutionalism. In: The Idea of Economic Constitution in Europe. Brill Nijhoff, 2022. p. 718-754.

27. CELESTE, Edoardo. Digital constitutionalism: a new systematic theorisation. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, v. 33, n. 1, p. 76-99, 2019.

28. DE GREGORIO, Giovanni. Digital constitutionalism across the Atlantic. Global Constitutionalism, v. 11, n. 2, p. 297-324, 2022.

29. DE GREGORIO, Giovanni. The rise of digital constitutionalism in the European Union. International Journal of Constitutional Law, v. 19, n. 1, p. 41-70, 2021.

30. GOLIA, Angelo. The Critique of Digital Constitutionalism. Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law & International Law (MPIL) Research Paper, n. 2022-13, 2022.

31. FLONK, Daniëlle. Emerging illiberal norms: Russia and China as promoters of internet content control. International Affairs, v. 97, n. 6, p. 1925-1944, 2021.

32. FLONK, Daniëlle; JACHTENFUCHS, Markus; OBENDIEK, Anke S. Authority conflicts in internet governance: Liberals vs. sovereigntists?. Global Constitutionalism, v. 9, n. 2, p. 364-386, 2020.

33. SCHERRER, Christoph. Embeddedness of power relations in global value chains. Economic and Social Upgrading in Global Value Chains: Comparative Analyses, Macroeconomic Effects, the Role of Institutions and Strategies for the Global South, p. 121-143, 2022.

34. ZUMBANSEN, Peer. “Economic law” and the contractual constitution of global supply chains. 2019.

35. SCHERRER, Christoph. The “nested” power of TNCs: Smallholders’ biggest challenge. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, v. 10, n. 2, p. 391-403, 2021.

36. BECKMAN, Ludvig. Power and future people’s freedom: intergenerational domination, climate change, and constitutionalism. Journal of Political Power, v. 9, n. 2, p. 289-307, 2016.

37. GHALEIGH, Navraj Singh; SETZER, Joana; WELIKALA, Asanga. The complexities of comparative climate constitutionalism. Journal of Environmental Law, v. 34, n. 3, p. 517-528, 2022.