AMBIENTE, DEMOCRACIA E IGUALDADE

 

AULA INTRODUTÓRIA

A pobreza relativa diminuiu?

Igualdade e desigualdade

Desigualdade

Pobreza e poluição

Slide

                                                                                    https://www.heart-resources.org/reading_pack/pollution-and-poverty/

TNEs causam $ 2,2T em danos ambientais todos os anos

TNEs e a exportação do dano ambiental

I - DEMOCRACIA ECOLÓGICA

AULA 1 - Conceitos, tipos e importância

1. SAMPAIO, JAL. Democracia, Constituição e realidade

2. Types of democracy

AULA 2 - Democracia ecológica

3. GIOVANNINI, Fabio. ¿ La democracia es buena para el medio ambiente?. Ecología política, n. 5, p. 61-72, 1993.

4. DE MORAIS, Lucas Andrade; DE FREITAS, Lucia Santana. Democracia e meio ambiente: um estudo bibliométrico da produção científica. Research, Society and Development, v. 9, n. 7,, 2020.

AULA 3 - Acordo de Escazú - Aspectos Gerais

Texto do Acordo

5. Carlos de Miguel. Acuerdo de Escazú: pacto para la eco-nomía y democracia del siglo XXI. In PRIEUR, M. et al (ed). Acuerdo de Escazú Hacia la democracia ambiental en América Latina y el Caribe. Santa Fé: Ciencia y tecnologia, 2020, p. 20-33

6. María Eugenia Di Paola; María Laura Castillo Díaz. Principio 10: de Río 92 a Río+20 América Latina y el Caribe.¿Qué 20 años no es nada?. In PRIEUR, M. et al (ed). Acuerdo de Escazú Hacia la democracia ambiental en América Latina y el Caribe. Santa Fé: Ciencia y tecnologia, 2020, p. 35-43

AULA 4 - Acordo de Escazú - Destaques (I)

7. Marcos A. Orellana. Escazú como expresión del vínculo entre derechos humanos y ambiente.In PRIEUR, M. et al (ed). Acuerdo de Escazú Hacia la democracia ambiental en América Latina y el Caribe. Santa Fé: Ciencia y tecnologia, 2020, p. 128-139

8. Paulo Afonso Leme Machado. El derecho de acceso a la información ambiental en el Acuerdo de Escazú.In PRIEUR, M. et al (ed). Acuerdo de Escazú Hacia la democracia ambiental en América Latina y el Caribe. Santa Fé: Ciencia y tecnologia, 2020, p. 189-199

AULA 5 - Acordo de Escazú - Destaques (II)

9. Aníbal Falbo. Los mecanismos de participación previstos en el Acuerdo de Escazú. In PRIEUR, M. et al (ed). Acuerdo de Escazú Hacia la democracia ambiental en América Latina y el Caribe. Santa Fé: Ciencia y tecnologia, 2020, p. 218-226

10. Néstor A. Cafferatta. El debido proceso ambiental en el Acuerdo Regional de Escazú.In PRIEUR, M. et al (ed). Acuerdo de Escazú Hacia la democracia ambiental en América Latina y el Caribe. Santa Fé: Ciencia y tecnologia, 2020, p. 233-244

11. Gabriela Burdiles Peruci. Los mecanismos de acceso a la justicia incorporados en el Acuerdo de Escazú.In PRIEUR, M. et al (ed). Acuerdo de Escazú Hacia la democracia ambiental en América Latina y el Caribe. Santa Fé: Ciencia y tecnologia, 2020, p. 247-259

II- IGUALDADE E AMBIENTE

AULA 6 - Igualdade e diferença

12. ROSALES, Carlos Manuel. Genealogía de la desigualdad. Pensamiento Jurídico, n. 51, 2020.

AULA  7 - As razões da igualdade e da diferença

13. SANTOS, Boaventura de Sousa. Desigualdad, exclusión y globalización: hacia la construcción multicultural de la igualdad y la diferencia. Revista de interculturalidad, v. 1, n. 1, p. 9-44, 2005.

Justiça ambiental - Ambiente, igualdade e preconceito

13. LEGARDA, Alicia Arriaga; BUENDÍA, Mercedes Pardo. Justicia ambiental. El estado de la cuestión. Revista internacional de sociología, v. 69, n. 3, p. 627-648, 2011.

AULA 8 - Justiça ambiental - conflitos e movimentos (I)

14. ALIER, Joan Martínez. Conflictos ecológicos y justicia ambiental. Papeles de relaciones ecosociales y cambio global, v. 103, p. 11-28, 2008.

AULA 9 - Justiça ambiental - conflitos e movimentos (II)

15. MERLINSKY, Gabriela. Los movimientos de justicia ambiental y la defensa de lo común en América Latina. Cinco tesis en elaboración. Ecología política latinoamericana: pensamiento crítico, diferencia latinoamericana y rearticulación epistémica, v. 2, p. 241-264, 2017.

III - EMPRESAS TRANSNACIONAIS, DESENVOLVIMENTO, DEMOCRACIA E IGUALDADE

AULA 10 - Governança global - Problemas e conceitos

16. GILL, Stephen R. Gobernanza Global:“Cómo era, es y debería ser”. Una reflexión crítica. Foro internacional, v. 60, n. 4, p. 1261-1293, 2020.

AULA 11 - Governança global - As empresas transnacionais (I)

17. WALENIUS, Desirée. The impact of the power balance between the state and the transnational corporation on human rights. 2020.

AULA 12  - Governança global - As empresas transnacionais (II)

18. PILARSKA, Czesława. State failure in the context of the operations of transnational corporations. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, v. 64, n. 10, p. 88-106, 2020.

Texto de auxílio: 19. Laura Albareda Vivó. CAPITULO 2. Las autoridades privadas en la gobernanza global. In Responsabilidad social de la empresa, autoridades privadas y governanza global. Barcelona:  Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 2006, p. 51-118

AULA 13 -  Governança global - A responsabilidade das ETNs

20. BORGMEIER, Jonas. Addressing the Global Governance Deficit - Contributions of Corporate Social Responsibility and the UN Global Compact

21. BORGMEIER, Jonas; KOLMAS, Global Governance–Michal. How can corporate social responsibility and the UN Global Compact address the global governance deficit?.

22. Laura Albareda Vivó. CAPITULO 4. La Responsabilidad Social de la Empresa como forma de gobernanza global In Responsabilidad social de la empresa, autoridades privadas y governanza global. Barcelona: ,Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 2006, p. 161-214

AULA 14 - Governança global - a vinculação e responsabilização internacional das ETNs

23. CHALAKKAL, Kavitha. Access to Justice Under International Law: Claims Against Environmental Crimes of Transnational Corporations. Kavitha Chalakkal (2019),“Access to Justice under International Law: Claims against Environmental Crimes of Transnational Corporations”, ELCOP Yearbook of Human Rights, 2019.

24. Gérard Monédiaire. La hipótesis del efecto horizontal de la Convención de Aarhus. In PRIEUR, M. et al (ed). Acuerdo de Escazú Hacia la democracia ambiental en América Latina y el Caribe. Santa Fé: Ciencia y tecnologia, 2020, p. 59-70

Bibliografia adicional

LÓPEZ, Iván. Justicia ambiental. EUNOMÍA. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad, p. 261-268, 2014.

CANAZA CHOQUE, Franklin Américo. Justicia Ambiental vs Capitalismo Global Experiencias, Debates y Conflictos en el Perú. Revista de Investigaciones Altoandinas, v. 20, n. 3, p. 369-379, 2018.

RIECHMANN, Jorge. Tres principios básicos de justicia ambiental. Revista internacional de filosofía política, v. 21, p. 103-120, 2003.

LEGLER, Thomas. Gobernanza global. Global Governance. in Legler, T., Santa Cruz, A. and Zamudio, L.(eds), Introducción a las relaciones internacionales: América Latina y la política global [Introduction to International Relations: Latin America and Global Politics, México DF, México, Oxford University Press, UK, p. 253-282, 2013.

MILLÁN, Natalia; SANTANDER, Guillermo. El virus cosmopolita: lecciones de la COVID-19 para la reconfiguración del Estado-Nación y la gobernanza global. Geopolítica (s), v. 11, p. 251, 2020.

HENDI, Seyedeh Zahra. The role of multinational corporations in human security and environmental protection. Молодий вчений, n. 8, p. 417-424, 2017.

Responsabilidad corporativa y desarrollo sostenible: una perspectiva histórica y conceptual. Cuadernos de administración, v. 26, n. 43, p. 23-32, 2011.

Fundamentos históricos e crise do constitucionalismo

 

Aula inaugural - As bases antigas e medievais do Estado e da Constituição

Aula 1 - Maquiavel

Nederman, Cary, "Niccolò Machiavelli", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)

DE TOLEDO, Cézar de Alencar Arnaut; BERNARDO, Leandro Ferreira. Virtù e Fortuna no pensamento político de Maquiavel. Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences, v. 24, p. 91-102, 2002.

WINTER, Lairton Moacir. A concepção de Estado e de poder político em Maquiavel. Tempo da Ciência, v. 13, n. 25, p. 117-128, 2006.

Aula 2 - Hobbes, Spinoza e Rousseau

Lloyd, Sharon A. and Susanne Sreedhar, "Hobbes’s Moral and Political Philosophy", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)

El pensamiento filosófico político de Baruch Spinoza

Bertram, Christopher, "Jean Jacques Rousseau", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)

Aula 3 - Montesquieu, Locke e Kant

Bok, Hilary, "Baron de Montesquieu, Charles-Louis de Secondat", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)

Tuckness, Alex, "Locke’s Political Philosophy", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.),

Rauscher, Frederick, "Kant’s Social and Political Philosophy", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)

Aula 4 - As grandes ideias - Soberania, contractarianismo e contratualismo

Philpott, Daniel, "Sovereignty", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)

Cudd, Ann and Seena Eftekhari, "Contractarianism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed)

Ashford, Elizabeth and Tim Mulgan, "Contractualism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)

Bristow, William, "Enlightenment", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017 Edition)

Aula 5 - As grandes ideias - Iluminismo, constitucionalismo e estado de direito

SMITH, Steven D. Recovering (From) Enlightenment?. In: America and Enlightenment Constitutionalism. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2006. p. 13-55.

LA TORRE, Massimo. Constitutionalism and legal reasoning. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007. Cap. 1

LAW, David S.; VERSTEEG, Mila. The evolution and ideology of global constitutionalism. Calif. L. Rev., v. 99, p. 1163, 2011.

Martin Krygier. Rule of Law, p. 233-245

Aula 6 - As grandes ideias - Democracia

Cristiano, Tom. Democracy. SEP, 2021.

Günter Frankenberg. Democracy, p. 252-267

SAMPAIO, JAL. Democracia, constituição e realidade. RLDC, 2004.

Aula 7 - As grandes ideias - Dignidade e direitos

Matthias Mahlmann. Human Dignity and Autonomy in Modern Constitutional Orders, p. 371-395.

Aula 8 - As grandes ideias - Liberalismo

Orígenes del liberalismo clasico: Althusius, Locke, Spinoza

O pensamento político de John Locke e o surgimento do liberalismo

Gaus, Gerald, Shane D. Courtland, and David Schmidtz, "Liberalism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.).

Laski, H. The foundation of economic liberalism In Political Thought in England from Locke to Bentham. In Political Thought in England from Locke to Bentham, 1920.

Aula 9 - As crises e críticas analógicas

FRERICHS, Sabine et al. Re-embedding neo-liberal constitutionalism: a Polanyian case for the economic sociology of law. Hart publishing, 2011.

STRANGE, Gerard. China's post-Listian rise: beyond radical globalisation theory and the political economy of neoliberal hegemony. New Political Economy, v. 16, n. 5, p. 539-559, 2011.

LI, He. Chinese Discourse on Constitutionalism and Its Impact on Reforms. Journal of Chinese Political Science, v. 22, n. 3, p. 407-427, 2017.

HENDRIKSE, Reijer. Neo-illiberalism. Geoforum, v. 95, p. 169-172, 2018.

KOCHI, Tarik. The End of Global Constitutionalism and Rise of Antidemocratic Politics. Global Society, v. 34, n. 4, p. 487-506, 2020.

Aula 10 e 11 - A New Constitutionalism?

DEMURO, Gianmario. A New Idea of Constitutionalism Facing the Global Constitutional Law. Italian J. Pub. L., v. 12, p. 80, 2020.

ÁVILA SANTAMARÍA, Ramiro Fernando. Neoconstitucionalismo latinoamericano. In ÁVILA SANTAMARÍA, Ramiro Fernando. El neoconstitucionalismo transformador: el Estado y el derecho en la Constitución de 2008. 2011, p. 53-80

RODRIGUES, Saulo Tarso; MARTÍN, Núria Belloso. Do pós-moderno ao pós-colonial: o constitucionalismo latino-americano e novas intersubjetividades coletivas. Uma desconstrução dos discursos hegemônicos no direito a partir da ética do outro. JURIS-Revista da Faculdade de Direito, v. 20, p. 181-241, 2013.

TEUBNER, Gunther. The project of constitutional sociology: Irritating nation-state constitutionalism. In: Critical theory and legal autopoiesis. Manchester University Press, 2019. p. 302-316.

Aula 12 a 14 - A New Global Political Power Constellation

URUMURTHY, Anita; CHAMI, Nandini. Towards a Global Digital Constitutionalism: A Radical New Agenda for UN75. Development, p. 1-10, 2021.

SUZOR, Nicolas. Digital constitutionalism: Using the rule of law to evaluate the legitimacy of governance by platforms. Social Media+ Society, v. 4, n. 3, 2018.

DE MINICO, Giovanna. Internet: Rules and Anarchy. The test of algorithms. Giurcost. org, Liber Amicorum per Pasquale Costanzo, v. 28, 2020.

CRAWFORD, Kate. Can an algorithm be agonistic? Ten scenes from life in calculated publics. Science, Technology, & Human Values, v. 41, n. 1, p. 77-92, 2016.

Constitutionalism issues and others

Dieter Grimm. Types of Constitutions, p. 98-131

Li-Ann Thio. Constitutionalism in Illiberal Polities, p. 133-149

David Dyzenhaus. States of Emergency, p. 442-461

GAMBLE, Andrew. Neo-liberalism. Capital & class, v. 25, n. 3, p. 127-134, 2001.

THORSEN, Dag Einar; LIE, Amund. What is neoliberalism. Oslo, University of Oslo, Department of Political Science, Manuscript, p. 1-21, 2006.

GOEURY, Hugo. Rafael Correa’s Decade in Power (2007–2017): Citizens’ Revolution, Sumak Kawsay, and Neo-Extractivism in Ecuador. Latin American Perspectives, v. 48, n. 3, p. 206-226, 2021.

DO MAR CASTRO VARELA, María; TAMAYO ROJAS, Carolina. Epistemicide, postcolonial resistance and the state. Postcolonial Studies, v. 23, n. 2, p. 226-240, 2020.

HIRSCHL, Ran. Opting out of “global constitutionalism”. The Law & Ethics of Human Rights, v. 12, n. 1, p. 1-36, 2018.

KOCH, Cédric M. Varieties of populism and the challenges to Global Constitutionalism: Dangers, promises and implications. Global Constitutionalism, p. 1-39, 2020.

JOHNS, Fleur. Global governance through the pairing of list and algorithm. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, v. 34, n. 1, p. 126-149, 2016.

TRANSFORMAÇÕES DE BASE

MARACHA, Viacheslav G. Digitalization and the Socio-Cultural World.

NISIOTI, Eleni; MOULIN-FRIER, Clément. Grounding Artificial Intelligence in the Origins of Human Behavior. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.08564, 2020.

SARAEV, Nikolay et al. Problems of forming a positive consciousness of people in the conditions of digitalization of society. In: E3S Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences, 2021. p. 10029.

DRUM, Kevin. Tech world: Welcome to the digital revolution. Foreign Aff., v. 97, p. 43, 2018.

KORTE, Martin. The impact of the digital revolution on human brain and behavior: where do we stand?. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, v. 22, n. 2, p. 101, 2020.

POPKOVA, Elena G.; GULZAT, Kantoro. Technological revolution in the 21 st century: digital society vs. artificial intelligence. In: Institute of Scientific Communications Conference. Springer, Cham, 2019. p. 339-345.

SANDBERG, Roy et al. Surveillance capitalism in the context of futurology: An inquiry to the implications of surveillance capitalism on the future of humanity. 2020.

ANDERSON, Janna; RAINIE, Lee; LUCHSINGER, Alex. Artificial intelligence and the future of humans. Pew Research Center, v. 10, p. 12, 2018.

.

ESTADO

JENSEN, Jakob Linaa. THE RETURN OF MEDIEVAL SOCIETY–CONTROL, SURVEILLANCE AND NEO-FEUDALISM IN THE AGE OF THE INTERNET. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research, v. 2019, 2019.

CLEAVE, Peter. Two Suns? The Algorithmic State: History and Theory. Te Kaharoa, v. 17, n. 1, 2021.

CLEAVE, Peter. Two Suns? Data, Algorithms, Spaces and Techno Feudalism. Te Kaharoa, v. 17, n. 1, 2021.

CLEAVE, Peter. Two Suns? The Algorithmic State: The Bones of the Argument. Te Kaharoa, v. 17, n. 1, 2021.

CÂNDEA, Ştefan. 41. Data Feudalism: How Platforms Shape Cross-border Investigative Networks. Towards a Critical Data Practice, p. 295, 2021.

GSTREIN, Oskar J.; KOCHENOV, Dimitry. Digital Identity and Distributed Ledger Technology: Paving the Way to a Neo-Feudal Brave New World?. Frontiers in Blockchain, v. 3, p. 10, 2020.

BHAGAT, Ali; PHILLIPS, Rachel. The Techfare State: Reconstituting Finance and Surveillance Governance in the Big tech Era. 2021.

LEWAN, Mats. The future of the nation-state: How the nation-state can find a way through digitalization. In: Digital Transformation and Public Services. Routledge, 2019. p. 293-317.

KOSTYUK, Nadiya et al. High-tech governance through big data surveillance: Tracing the global deployment of mass surveillance infrastructures, 1995 to present. Available at SSRN 3030347, 2017.

GARCÍA, Olaff Jasso. Las potencias mundiales contra las Big Tech. Publicación del Laboratorio de estudios sobre empresas transnacionales, p. 73, 2021.

SHULL, Aaron; BOYSEN, Andre. Governing Cyberspace during a Crisis in Trust. Governing Cyberspace during a Crisis in Trust essay. Waterloo, ON: CIGI. www. cigionline. org/articles/governing-cyberspace-during-crisis-trust, 2019.

MAZZUCATO, Mariana. Preventing digital feudalism. Project Syndicate, 2019.

RAHWAN, Iyad. Society-in-the-loop: programming the algorithmic social contract. Ethics and Information Technology, v. 20, n. 1, p. 5-14, 2018.

LEE, Kevin P. Constitutional Morality and the Emerging Social Imaginary of the Information Revolution. Available at SSRN 3370253, 2019.

PETIT, Nicolas; TEPPER, Jonathan; HEARN, Denise. Big tech and the digital economy: the moligopoly scenario. trabajo, p. 11, 2020.

PISTOR, Katharina. Rule by data: The end of markets?. Law & Contemp. Probs., v. 83, p. 101, 2020.

KILIC, Burcu. Digital trade rules: Big Tech’s end run around domestic regulations. Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung European Union, Brussels and Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung Washington, DC, 2021.

EGOROVA, Yuliya A.; BASHKINA, Irina E. Big Tech and their impact on the economic security.

SITARAMAN, Ganesh. Too big to prevail: The national security case for breaking up big tech. Foreign Aff., v. 99, p. 116, 2020.

BARENDREGT, Wolmet et al. Defund Big Tech, Refund Community. Tech Otherwise, 2021.

GURUMURTHY, Anita; CHAMI, Nandini. Towards a Global Digital Constitutionalism: A Radical New Agenda for UN75. Development, p. 1-10, 2021.

ZWITTER, Andrej; HAZENBERG, Jilles. Decentralized network governance: blockchain technology and the future of regulation. Frontiers in Blockchain, v. 3, p. 12, 2020.

LECLERCQ-VANDELANNOITTE, Aurélie; BERTIN, Emmanuel. From sovereign IT governance to liberal IT governmentality? A Foucauldian analogy. European Journal of Information Systems, v. 27, n. 3, p. 326-346, 2018.

NIEMIEC, Emilia. COVID‐19 and misinformation: Is censorship of social media a remedy to the spread of medical misinformation?. EMBO reports, v. 21, n. 11, p. e51420, 2020.

STJERNFELT, Frederik; LAURITZEN, Anne Mette. Facebook and Google as Offices of Censorship. In: Your Post has been Removed. Springer, Cham, 2020. p. 139-172.

LAND, Molly K. Against privatized censorship: proposals for responsible delegation. Va. J. Int'l L., v. 60, p. 363, 2019.

BOLLIER, David. Artificial intelligence comes of age. The promise and challenge of integrating AI into cars, healthcare and journalism. The Aspen Institute Communications and Society Program. Washington, DC, 2017.

LEINEN, Jo; BUMMEL, Andreas. The Need for a Global Government: Democracy in the Planetary Age. Cadmus, v. 3, n. 6, p. 156-162, 2019.

--- CUMPLICIDADE E TRANSIÇÃO

BORRÁS, Susana; EDLER, Jakob. The roles of the state in the governance of socio-technical systems’ transformation. Research Policy, v. 49, n. 5, p. 103971, 2020.

BAKIR, Vian. “Veillant panoptic assemblage”: Mutual watching and resistance to mass surveillance after Snowden. Media and Communication, v. 3, n. 3, p. 12-25, 2015.

CASILLI, Antonio. Four theses on digital mass surveillance and the negotiation of privacy. In: 8th Annual Privacy Law Scholar Congress 2015. 2015.

KIERNAN, Colin J.; MUELLER, Milton L. Standardizing Security: Surveillance, Human Rights, and the Battle Over Tls 1.3. Journal of Information Policy, v. 11, p. 1-25, 2021.

ESTADO DE DIREITO

HUANG, Zhixiong; MAČÁK, Kubo. Towards the international rule of law in cyberspace: contrasting chinese and western approaches. Chinese Journal of International Law, v. 16, n. 2, p. 271-310, 2017.

KENNEDY, Rónán. Algorithms and the Rule of Law. Legal Information Management, v. 17, n. 3, p. 170-172, 2017.

HILDEBRANDT, Mireille. Algorithmic regulation and the rule of law. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, v. 376, n. 2128, p. 20170355, 2018.

LESLIE, David et al. Artificial intelligence, human rights, democracy, and the rule of law: a primer. Available at SSRN 3817999, 2021.

DENCIK, Lina; KAUN, Anne. Datafication and the welfare state. Global Perspectives, v. 1, n. 1, 2020.

KITSOS, Panagiotis. The Limits of Government Surveillance. 2020.

DO CARMO BARRIGA, Antónia et al. The COVID-19 pandemic: yet another catalyst for governmental mass surveillance?. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, v. 2, n. 1, p. 100096, 2020.

FRIES, Martin. Man versus Machine: Using Legal Tech to Optimize the Rule of Law. Available at SSRN 2842726, 2016.

SEPARAÇÃO DOS PODERES

KRUHLOV, Vitalii et al. Public-private partnership in cybersecurity. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings. 2020. p. 619-628.

SILD, Jaana. Digitalization induced privatization of law.

MAAS, Jonne Julia Clara. The Power of Tech Companies: towards a non-dominating technology sector. 2020. Dissertação de Mestrado. University of Twente.

DIREITOS E DEMOCRACIA

AHMED, Zubeir. The Problematic Nature of Public Surveillance. ResPublica: Undergraduate Journal of Political Science, v. 5, n. 2, p. 78-83, 2021.

ZALNIERIUTE, Monika. From Data Retention to Facial Recognition Technologies: Counter-Terrorism Implications for Human Rights and the Rule of Law. Available at SSRN, 2021.

FREEMAN, Richard B. Who owns the robots rules the world. IZA World of Labor, 2015.

MCGAUGHEY, Ewan. Will robots automate your job away? Full employment, basic income, and economic democracy. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, Working Paper, n. 496, 2018.

TRÉGUER, Félix. The Reason of State, Surveillance & Radical Democracy. 2019.

GREITENS, Sheena Chestnut. Surveillance, security, and liberal democracy in the post-COVID world. International Organization, v. 74, n. S1, p. E169-E190, 2020.

HADJI-JANEV, Metodi. PROTECTING HUMAN RIGHTS: CAN DEMOCRACY SURVIVE THE MASS-SURVEILLANCE IN THE ONGOING DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION. CONTEMPORARY MACEDONIAN DEFENCE, 2021.

FUKUYAMA, Francis; RICHMAN, Barak; GOEL, Ashish. How to Save Democracy from Technology: Ending Big Tech's Information Monopoly. Foreign Aff., v. 100, p. 98, 2021.

SINKKONEN, Elina. Dynamic dictators: improving the research agenda on autocratization and authoritarian resilience. Democratization, p. 1-19, 2021.

TAYLOR, Veronica L. Regulatory rule of law. Regulatory theory: foundations and applications. ANU Press, Canberra, p. 393-413, 2017.

ADAMS, Maurice; JANSE, Ronald. Rule of law decay: terminology, causes, methods, markers and remedies. 2019.

Teoria do Estado Democrático Constitucional - Entre crises pandêmicas e tecnológicas

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEUo2faDJNA - Chomsky Big data

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pP7mt_Ie04Y - Chomsky Populism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=th3KE_H27bs&t=1s - the dirty secret of capitalism

I - Neoliberalismo: um conceito controverso 

1. MORNINGSTAR, Natalie. Neoliberalism. Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology, 2020. (I)

2. DUNN, Bill. Against neoliberalism as a concept. Capital & Class, v. 41, n. 3, p. 435-454, 2017. (I)

II - Estado neoliberal e suas implicações clássicas

3.KASHWAN, Prakash; MACLEAN, Lauren M.; GARCÍA-LÓPEZ, Gustavo A. Rethinking power and institutions in the shadows of neoliberalism:(An introduction to a special issue of World Development). World Development, v. 120, p. 133-146, 2019.

4. MAVELLI, Luca. Governing the resilience of neoliberalism through biopolitics. European Journal of International Relations, v. 23, n. 3, p. 489-512, 2017.

5. SAILORS, Olivia C. At the Nexus of Neoliberalism, Mass Incarceration, and Scientific Racism: the Conflation of Blackness with Risk in the 21st century. Tapestries: Interwoven voices of local and global identities, v. 9, n. 1, p. 7, 2020.

II - Estado neoliberal em tempo de Covid (3 aulas)

6. STANDRING, Adam; DAVIES, Jonathan. From crisis to catastrophe: The death and viral legacies of austere neoliberalism in Europe?. Dialogues in Human Geography, v. 10, n. 2, p. 146-149, 2020.

7. RUGITSKY, Fernando. The decline of neoliberalism: a play in three acts. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, v. 40, n. 4, p. 587-603, 2020.(II)

8.ŠUMONJA, Miloš. Neoliberalism is not dead–On political implications of Covid-19. Capital & Class, p. 0309816820982381, 2020. (II)

9. MURSHED, Syed Mansoob. Capitalism and COVID-19: Crisis at the Crossroads. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, v. 26, n. 3, 2020. (III)

WATERS, Alexander. Will neoliberal capitalism survive the coronavirus crash or is this the beginning of technofedualism?

III - Estado neoliberal digital ou Estado pós-neoliberal

Parte I - O mercado da inteligência artificial

10. BIRCH, Kean. Automated Neoliberalism? the digital organisation of markets in technoscientific capitalism. New Formations, v. 100, n. 100-101, p. 10-27, 2020.

Parte II - Entre o Estado sem governo e o Estado hipervigilante

11. UNDERWOOD, Ben; SAIEDIAN, Hossein. Mass surveillance: A study of past practices and technologies to predict future directions. Security and Privacy, p. e142.

12. SOULES, Marshall. Surveillance Capitalism Pandemic. New Explorations: Studies in Culture and Communication, v. 1, n. 2, 2020.

13. VESA, Mikko; TIENARI, Janne. Artificial intelligence and rationalized unaccountability: Ideology of the elites?. Organization, p. 1350508420963872, 2020.

14. DIGNAM, Alan. Artificial intelligence, tech corporate governance and the public interest regulatory response. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, v. 13, n. 1, p. 37-54, 2020.

15. DANEKE, Gregory A. Machina-economicus or homo-complexicus: Artificial intelligence and the future of economics?. real-world economics review, p. 18-36, 2020

16. VAN LOO, Rory. The new gatekeepers: private firms as public enforcers. Va. L. Rev., v. 106, p. 467, 2020.

17. VAN DIJCK, José. Governing digital societies: Private platforms, public values. Computer Law & Security Review, v. 36, p. 105377, 2020.

18. COHEN, Julie E. The Law of Informational Capitalism, p. 1461-1515

19. MOHAMED, Shakir; PNG, Marie-Therese; ISAAC, William. Decolonial AI: Decolonial theory as sociotechnical foresight in artificial intelligence. Philosophy & Technology, v. 33, n. 4, p. 659-684, 2020.

20.  GSTREIN, Oskar Josef. Mapping power and jurisdiction on the internet through the lens of government-led surveillance. Internet Policy Review, v. 9, n. 3, p. 1-17, 2020.

Extra

VOLK, Christian. The problem of sovereignty in globalized times. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 2019.

Peer Zumbansen, “Neither ‘Public’ nor ‘Private’, ‘National’ nor ‘International’.Transnational Corporate Governance from a Legal Pluralist Perspective,” Journal of Lawand Society 38(1) (2011)

JESSEN, Mathias Hein. Civil Society in the Shadow of the Neoliberal State. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, p. 1-14, 2020.

Machado, Pedro Lange Netto, and Thaiane Caldas Mendonça. "Da globalização financeira ao autoritarismo populista e neoliberal| From financial globalization to populist and neoliberal authoritarianism." Mural Internacional 11 (2020): 47937.

URIA, Agustín Rodríguez. ¿ Capitalismo thanático o Eros democrático? Notas sobre Mentir y colonizar: Obediencia inconsciente y subjetividad neoliberal, último libro de Nora Merlín. Revista Pilquen. Sección Ciencias Sociales, v. 23, n. 3, p. 118-123, 2020.

BRESSER-PEREIRA, Luiz Carlos. A democracia não está morrendo: Foi o neoliberalismo que fracassou. Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política, n. 111, p. 51-79, 2020.

DE PABLO, Juan Carlos et al. A propósito de" la paradoja populista". Universidad del CEMA, 2020.

COUTURE, Stephane; TOUPIN, Sophie. What does the notion of “sovereignty” mean when referring to the digital?. new media & society, v. 21, n. 10, p. 2305-2322, 2019.

LAURENCE, Sophie; GOV, A. P. Cybersoverignty: Redefining Digital Citizenship in the Cyber Era. 2019.

Estado, economia e desenvolvimento sustentável

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=th3KE_H27bs

1. MASSUGA, Flavia et al. SUSTENTABILIDADE VERSUS CAPITALISMO OU CAPITALISMO SUSTENTÁVEL? UMA REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA DA TENDÊNCIA SECULAR. Revista Metropolitana de Sustentabilidade (ISSN 2318-3233), v. 9, n. 3, p. 194, 2020.

2. GERMANO, Fernanda Dubiel; CARON, Antoninho; PONCHIROLLI, Osmar. INTERDEPENDÊNCIA: LUCRO, ÉTICA, RESPONSABILIDADE SOCIAL E ESTRATÉGIAS DAS ORGANIZAÇÕES. Caderno PAIC, v. 21, n. 1, p. 281-298, 2020.

3. ZAMORA CABOT, Francisco Javier. Gobernanza mundial y el binomio empresas-derechos humanos (Global Governance and the Business and Human Rights Duality). In: Anales de la Real Academia de Doctores de España. 2020.

4. GOMES, Frederico Pessanha; TORTATO, Ubiratã. Adoção de práticas de sustentabilidade como vantagem competitiva: evidências empíricas. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo em Administração, v. 5, n. 2, p. 33-49, 2011.

5. VALLAEYS, François. ¿ Por qué la Responsabilidad Social Empresarial no es todavía transformadora? Una aclaración filosófica. Andamios, v. 17, n. 42, p. 309-333, 2020.

6. VARGAS-JUVERA, Jorge Tadeo; CARRASCO-GALLEGOS, Brisa Violeta. Derechos humanos y transnacionales: una mirada a la falta de justicia socio-ambiental 

7. FERNANDES, Victor Alves; DE PAULA, Bruno Lucas Saliba. A Velha Novidade da Pandemia: Neoliberalismo, Meio Ambiente e Covid-19. Ciências Sociais Unisinos, v. 56, n. 2, p. 131-142, 2020.

8. PEREIRA, Juliana. Arquitetura da Impunidade. In PEREIRA, Juliana de Albuquerque. A pilhagem dos comuns ambientais ante a falta de regulamentação internacional sobre as empresas transnacionais. p. 168-189, 2020.

9. BOHM, Maria Laura. Empresas transnacionales, violaciones de derechos humanos y violencia estructural en América Latina: un enfoque criminológico. Crítica Penal y Poder, n. 13, 2017.

10. OLSEN, Ana Carolina Lopes; PAMPLONA, Danielle Anne. Violações a direitos humanos por empresas transnacionais na América Latina: perspectivas de responsabilização. Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia, v. 7, n. 13, p. 129-151, 2019.

11. CARDIA, Ana Cláudia Ruy. Direitos humanos e empresas no Brasil: como as empresas mineradoras têm afetado a proteção dos direitos humanos no território brasileiro. Homa Publica-Revista Internacional de Direitos Humanos e Empresas, v. 2, n. 1, p. 025-025, 2018.

12. GIULIANI, Elisa. Human rights and corporate social responsibility in developing countries’ industrial clusters. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 133, n. 1, p. 39-54, 2016.

13. GUDYNAS, Eduardo. Extractivismos: el concepto, sus expresiones y sus múltiples violencias. Papeles de relaciones ecosociales y cambio global, v. 143, p. 61-70, 2018.

14. SALEME, EDSON RICARDO; SABORITA, Silvia Elena Barreto. A ADOÇÃO DA SUSTENTABILIDADE DOS GRUPOS TRANSNACIONAIS, E OS ESFORÇOS DA OCDE. Revista de Direito, Economia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável, v. 5, n. 1, p. 23-38, 2019.

15. KHOURY, Stéfanie; WHYTE, David. Sidelining corporate human rights violations: The failure of the OECD’s regulatory consensus. Journal of Human Rights, v. 18, n. 4, p. 363-381, 2019.

16. BILCHITZ, David. The necessity for a business and human rights treaty. Business and Human Rights Journal, v. 1, n. 2, p. 203-227, 2016.

Leitura complementar

CANO, Carlos Alberto Gómez; CASTILLO, Verenice Sánchez; ROJAS, Edwin Eduardo Millán. Capitalismo y ética: una relación de tensiones. ECONÓMICAS CUC, v. 40, n. 2, p. 31-42, 2019.

LÓPEZ LÓPEZ, José de Jesús; LÓPEZ LÓPEZ, Emeterio. La teoría económica y el bienestar social en tiempos de pandemia: reflejo del lado oscuro del capitalismo. 2020.

WOLKMER, Maria de Fatima Schumacher; FERRAZZO, Débora. O Paradoxo do Desenvolvimento: Direito Ambiental e Bens Comuns no Capitalismo. Veredas do Direito: Direito Ambiental e Desenvolvimento Sustentável, v. 15, n. 33, p. 163-189, 2018.

LAZCANO, Gustavo A. Segura. Egoístas y autómatas del capitalismo global. Antropología Experimental, n. 20, p. 313-320, 2020.

DE OLIVEIRA CARLOS, Maria da Graça. O CSP do setor bancário: Relação entre os fatores socioambientais e de governança Contabilometria, v. 7, n. 2, 2020.

AMEL-ZADEH, Amir; SERAFEIM, George. Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey. Financial Analysts Journal, v. 74, n. 3, p. 87-103, 2018.

FATEMI, Ali; GLAUM, Martin; KAISER, Stefanie. ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, v. 38, p. 45-64, 2018.

ALEXANDRINO, Thaynan Cavalcanti. Análise da relação entre os indicadores de desempenho sustentável (ESG) e desempenho economico-financeiro de empresas listadas na B3. 2020. Dissertação de Mestrado. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco.

BASTOS, Pedro Paulo Zahluth; BELLUZZO, Luiz Gonzaga. Capitalismo, Neoliberalismo e Democracia: propostas para uma agenda de pesquisa. ALMADA; JABBOUR; PAULA (Organizadores). Repensar o Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: AMFG, p. 18-89, 2020.