I - Relações subjacentes: capitalismo pós-tudo
1. GROHMANN, Rafael. Financeirização, midiatização e dataficação como sínteses sociais. In Mediaciones de la Comunicación, v. 14, n. 2, p. 97-117, 2019. (***)
2. WHITEHEAD, Mark. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism-A Review Essay. 2019.
3. LYON, David. Surveillance capitalism, surveillance culture and data politics. Data Politics: Worlds, Subjects, Rights. Abingdon: Routledge, p. 64-77, 2019.
II - Constitucionalismo digital
4. CELESTE, Edoardo. Digital constitutionalism: a new systematic theorisation. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, v. 33, n. 1, p. 76-99, 2019. (***)
5. SUZOR, Nicolas. Digital constitutionalism: Using the rule of law to evaluate the legitimacy of governance by platforms. Social Media+ Society, v. 4, n. 3, p. 2056305118787812, 2018.
6. SUZOR, Nicolas. The responsibilities of platforms: a new constitutionalism to promote the legitimacy of decentralized governance. Policy, v. 2016, p. 2014, 2018. (***)
7. LIU, Hin-Yan. The Digital Disruption of Human Rights Foundations. In: Human Rights, Digital Society and the Law. Routledge, 2019. p. 75-86..(***)
8. REDEKER, Dennis; GILL, Lex; GASSER, Urs. Towards digital constitutionalism? Mapping attempts to craft an Internet Bill of Rights. International Communication Gazette, v. 80, n. 4, p. 302-319, 2018.
9. PETTRACHIN, Andrea. Towards a universal declaration on internet rights and freedoms?. International Communication Gazette, v. 80, n. 4, p. 337-353, 2018.
10. ENES, Graça. Digital platforms and European Union law–challenges from a perspective of multilevel constitutionalism. UNIO-EU Law Journal, v. 5, n. 1, p. 16-39, 2019.
-- Complemento
GERVASSIS, Nicholas J. From contractual serfdom to human rights liberation: doing justice to virtual lives. 2011.
III - Algocracia ou a democracia na era do algoritmo
11. DANAHER, John. The threat of algocracy: Reality, resistance and accommodation. Philosophy & Technology, v. 29, n. 3, p. 245-268, 2016. (***)
12. JUST, Natascha; LATZER, Michael. Governance by algorithms: reality construction by algorithmic selection on the Internet. Media, culture & society, v. 39, n. 2, p. 238-258, 2017
13. ROUVROY, Antoinette; STIEGLER, Bernard. The digital regime of truth: from the algorithmic governmentality to a new rule of law. La Deleuziana: Online Journal of Philosophy, v. 3, p. 6-29, 2016. (***)
14. RAINIE, Lee; ANDERSON, Janna; PAGE, D. Code-dependent: Pros and cons of the algorithm age. Pew Research Center, v. 8, 2017.
15. TENOVE, Chris et al. Digital threats to democratic elections: How foreign actors use digital techniques to undermine democracy. 2018. (***)
16. Towards Digital Enlightenment Essays on the Dark and Light Sides of the Digital Revolution, p. 73-102
17. Towards Digital Enlightenment Essays on the Dark and Light Sides of the Digital Revolution, p. 103-156
18. BINNS, Reuben. Algorithmic accountability and public reason. Philosophy & Technology, v. 31, n. 4, p. 543-556, 2018
19. ZUBOFF, S. “We Make Them Dance”: Surveillance Capitalism,
the Rise of Instrumentarian Power, and the Threat to
Human Rights. In Human Rights in the Age of Platforms, p. 3-51 (***)
20. MANHEIM, Karl M.; KAPLAN, Lyric. Artificial Intelligence: Risks to Privacy and Democracy. 2018. (***)
20. MANHEIM, Karl M.; KAPLAN, Lyric. Artificial Intelligence: Risks to Privacy and Democracy. 2018. (***)
IV - Constitucionalismo na era do pós- e trans-humano
22. HUGHES, James J. The Politics of Transhumanism and the Techno‐Millennial Imagination, 1626–2030. Zygon®, v. 47, n. 4, p. 757-776, 2012. ***
23. LE DEVEDEC, Nicolas. Unfit for the future? The depoliticization of human perfectibility, from the Enlightenment to transhumanism. European Journal of Social Theory, v. 21, n. 4, p. 488-507, 2018. (***)
24. CABRERO, Javier Romañach. Las propuestas éticas y sociales del transhumanismo y los Derechos Humanos= Ethical and social proposals of transhumanism and Human Rights. UNIVERSITAS. Revista de Filosofía, Derecho y Política, p. 2-38, 2016.
25. PINTO, Ana Teixeira. Capitalism with a Transhuman Face: The Afterlife of Fascism and the Digital Frontier. Third Text, v. 33, n. 3, p. 315-336, 2019. (***)
26. KIRCHHOFFER, David G. Human dignity and human enhancement: a multidimensional approach. Bioethics, v. 31, n. 5, p. 375-383, 2017. (***)
27. PALK, Andrea C. The implausibility of appeals to human dignity: an investigation into the efficacy of notions of human dignity in the transhumanism debate. South African Journal of Philosophy, v. 34, n. 1, p. 39-54, 2015. (***)
28. PORTER, Allen. Bioethics and transhumanism. In: The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine. Oxford University Press, 2017. p. 237-260.
29. DEBAETS, Amy Michelle. Enhancement for All? A Feminist Ethical Analysis of the Discourses and Practices of Democratic Transhumanism. In: Proceedings from the Societas Ethica Annual Conference 2011; The Quest for perfection. The Future of Medicine/Medicine of the future; August 25-28; 2011; Universita della Svizzera Italiana; Lugano; Switzerland. Linköping University Electronic Press, 2013. p. 1-15.
30. CATLAW, Thomas J.; TREISMAN, Chase. Is" Man" Still the Subject of Administration? Antihumanism, Transhumanism, and the Challenge of Entangled Governance. Administrative Theory & Praxis, v. 36, n. 4, p. 441-465, 2014.
31. STEINHOFF, James. Transhumanism and Marxism: philosophical connections. 2014.
Videos
