Ativismo Judicial - 2019.2

I – Aspectos conceituais

1. JALS. Teoria da Constituição e dos Direitos Fundamentais (Ativismo)

2. CROSS, Frank B.; LINDQUIST, Stefanie A. The scientific study of judicial activism. Minn. L. Rev., v. 91, p. 1752, 2006.

3. TUSHNET, Mark. New forms of judicial review and the persistence of rights-and democracy-based worries. In: Bills of Rights. Routledge, 2017. p. 265-290.

4. FUENTES-ROHWER, Luis. Taking Judicial Legitimacy Seriously. Chi.-Kent L. Rev., v. 93, p. 505, 2018.

5. EASTERBROOK, Frank H. Do liberals and conservatives differ in judicial activism. U. Colo. L. Rev., v. 73, p. 1401, 2002

6. CARTABIA, Marta. Europe and rights: taking dialogue seriously. European Constitutional Law Review, v. 5, n. 1, p. 5-31, 2009.

7. TREMBLAY, Luc B. The legitimacy of judicial review: The limits of dialogue between courts and legislatures. International Journal of Constitutional Law, v. 3, n. 4, p. 617-648, 2005.

8. CAMERON, Jamie. Collateral thoughts on dialogue's legacy as metaphor and theory: A favourite from Canada. U. Queensland LJ, v. 35, p. 157, 2016.

8b. SIEGEL, Neil S. Interring the Rhetoric of Judicial Activism. DePaul L. Rev., v. 59, p. 555, 2009.

II – Judicial Review e Política de Austeridade

9. BARBERO, Iker. When rights need to be (re) claimed: Austerity measures, neoliberal housing policies and anti-eviction activism in Spain. Critical Social Policy, v. 35, n. 2, p. 270-280, 2015.

10. ALMEIDA RIBEIRO, Gonçalo. Judicial Activism Against Austeriy in Portugal. International Journal of Constitutional Law Blog, 2013.

11. EVERSON, Michelle; JOERGES, Christian. 11 Who is the guardian of constitutionalism in Europe after the financial crisis?. Political Representation in the European Union: Still democratic in times of crisis?, p. 197, 2014.

III – Ativismo Judicial e estado de exceção

12. The Functions of Courts in Authoritarian Politics

13. Courts in Authoritarian Regimes

14. Of Judges and Generals: Security Courts under Authoritarian Regimes in Argentina, Brazil, and Chile

15. QUANSAH, E. K.; FOMBAD, C. M. Judicial activism in Africa: Possible defence against authoritarian resurgence. 

16. D’ALMEIDA, Alexandre Pedro Moura et al. Confrontation Between Judicial Activism and State of Exception. Academicus International Scientific Journal, v. 8, n. 15, p. 28-46, 2017.

17. TEITEL, Ruti. Transitional justice and judicial activism-A right to accountability. Cornell Int'l LJ, v. 48, p. 385, 2015.

IV - Ativismo Judicial e Direitos Sociais

18. CHRISTIANSEN, Eric C. Using constitutional adjudication to remedy socio-economic injustice: Comparative lesson from South Africa. UCLA J. Int'l L. & Foreign Aff., v. 13, p. 369, 2008.

19. RODRÍGUEZ-GARAVITO, César. Beyond the courtroom: The impact of judicial activism on socioeconomic rights in Latin America. Tex. L. Rev., v. 89, p. 1669, 2010.

20. PEERENBOOM, Randall. Economic and Social Rights: The Role of Courts in China. San Diego Int'l LJ, v. 12, p. 303, 2010.

21. SAFFON, María Paula; GARCÍA-VILLEGAS, Mauricio. Derechos sociales y activismo judicial: la dimensión fáctica del activismo judicial en derechos sociales en Colombia. Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, v. 13, n. 1, p. 75-107, 2011.

V - Ativismo Judicial - Comparado

22. SAURUGGER, Sabine; TERPAN, Fabien. Measuring Judicial Activism: Is the Court of Justice of the European Union an activist court. In: Fifteenth Biennial Conference of the European Union Studies Association, Miami. 2017. p. 4-6.

23. MATE, Manoj. Globalization, Rights, and Judicial Review in the Supreme Court of India. Pac. Rim L. & Pol'y J., v. 25, p. 643, 2016.